This classic and unforgettable Art Deco ring in 18K yellow gold features a beautiful red ruby ( July Birthstone ) of 0.86 carat, securely four prong set in a millgrain prong fishtail setting with delicate scroll engraving down the sides of the ring. Four shimmering F/G color and VS clarity round diamonds totaling 0.06 carat frame the center stone in a show of brilliance. Measuring 6.05 millimeters wide at the widest point at the top of the ring, it tapers down to 1.9 millimeters at the bottom of the band and sits 6.4 millimeters off the finger. This ring would make the perfect gift for the ruby lover in your life - or for you!
Size 6 1/2 and can be expertly sized by our jewelers. Optional ring sizing is orderable separately above.
* This ring takes 7-10 business days for our jewelers to craft for you in the USA (including optional ring sizing) and ships when complete - please contact us for details.
In the European tradition of having a ruby as the centerpiece of an engagement ring, this ring makes a wonderful alternative to the usual diamond engagement ring.
This ring is shown with WR283Y50 for display purposes only. An order for R408Y does not include the 18K yellow gold and diamond wedding band. WR283Y50 is orderable separately HERE.
Insured shipping is FREE, and all rings are sent to you in beautiful Antique Jewelry Mall gift packaging.
| Engagement Ring|
|Metal:|| 18K Yellow gold|
|Width at top of ring:|| 6.1 mm|
|Width at bottom of ring:|| 1.9 mm|
|Height off finger:|| 6.4 mm|
|Ring sizing:|| Available|
|Heritage:|| New Reproduction|
|Design period:|| Art Deco|
|Weight:|| 0.86 carat|
|Setting style:|| Millgrain prong fishtail|
|AGTA Code:|| H|
|Weight:|| 0.06 carat total|
|Setting style:|| Flush bead prong|
Questions & Answers about Art Deco Ruby and Diamonds Engraved Engagement Ring in 18 Karat Yellow Gold
Our Customers Say...
"I am thoroughly pleased with my purchase. I am a civil war
living historian and the rose gold band fits well into this era. My original
wedding band is made of rose gold and came from 1863. Due to its antiquity I
don't like wearing it too much, especially at re-enactments. This new ring will
allow me to do that. Thank you." - Paul F.